I was once asked to buy a half page advertisement in the Australian Financial Review. The $15,000 cost has been approved by the board of this small not-for-profit organisation. The objective was to help the CEO get meetings with the CEOs of potential corporate partners with interests in the countries we worked. I argued this wasn’t going to work so the CEO challenged me to come up with a better idea. That idea was to buy a very nice bottle of wine, apply our own labels and swing tag that include our message, including a personalised link to a video message from our CEO inviting them to meet. The inspiration was to send something so nice that internal gatekeepers felt obliged to give the wine to their CEO. With no obvious corporate markings, we knew the CEOs would inspect the wine and read our labels. The personalised urls also meant we could confirm this. Our CEO received personal thanks from all but one recipient. More importantly, he had seven meetings in the coming three months, resulting in multiyear partnerships with IBM, Exxon Mobile, and Westpac. 

Since this campaign, I’ve always felt that a lack of creativity is a bigger barrier than a lack of budget for not-for-profit organisations. Yet more all too often, I see boring campaigns failing to yield strong fundraising results despite many organisations having significant budgets. With a growing body of work focused on marketing science and advertising effectiveness, we now have strong evidence to support the role of creativity in effective and efficient fundraising. 

‍

1. The Creativity Advantage

1.1 Defining Advertising Creativity

Advertising creativity, while often perceived as an elusive, artistic quality, is a critical component of marketing success and a significant driver of business performance. Unlike creativity in the fine arts, which may prioritise self-expression, advertising creativity is inherently purpose-driven. Its primary function is to achieve specific communication objectives, such as building awareness, generating interest, fostering desire, or prompting action. It must operate within a goal-directed, problem-solving context.

Despite its importance, defining and measuring advertising creativity presents considerable challenges. Researchers acknowledge it as one of the most complex human behaviors to describe, with some even suggesting it defies definition or measurement.  However, a consensus has emerged around two core dimensions: originality and appropriateness. Originality refers to the novelty, uniqueness, or unexpectedness of an advertisement – its ability to diverge from the norm. Appropriateness, conversely, relates to the relevance, usefulness, and strategic fit of the creative execution to the product, target audience, and marketing objectives. Originality alone is insufficient; the creative work must also be valuable and adaptive to task constraints to be truly effective. Some frameworks also incorporate elements like elaboration (detailed execution) or synthesis (connecting previously unrelated concepts).

Effective advertising creativity evokes an emotional response in the audience, which subsequently translates into tangible business outcomes like increased fundraising or improved brand perceptions. It involves establishing new, meaningful relationships between concepts in a relevant and believable manner. The pursuit of quantifiable benchmarks and standardised evaluations has led to the development of various metrics and frameworks, aiming to provide objective insights into creative performance and its economic impact. Tools analyzing factors like interaction density, innovation rate, audience engagement, and even predictive attention through AI are increasingly employed.

Establishing a clear, robust definition of advertising creativity, incorporating both originality and appropriateness, is fundamental before its impact can be reliably measured and analyzed. Without a shared understanding of what creativity is, attempts to correlate it with effectiveness risk comparing disparate concepts, leading to inconsistent or misleading conclusions. This inherent tension between the subjective 'art' of creation and the objective 'science' of measurement remains a central challenge. The demand for demonstrable financial returns pushes towards quantification, yet the complex, multifaceted nature of creative quality resists simple metrics.  Successfully navigating this requires a balanced approach, using metrics thoughtfully to inform, not dictate, creative judgment, thereby justifying investment while preserving the potential for truly breakthrough ideas.

1.2 How Creative Campaigns Outperform

A substantial body of evidence confirms that advertising creativity is not merely aesthetic decoration but a powerful driver of effectiveness and a source of competitive advantage. Research consistently demonstrates a strong positive correlation between creative quality and key business outcomes.

Perhaps most compellingly, creative quality has been identified as the single largest contributor to incremental sales generated by advertising campaigns. Analysis by NCSolutions indicates that the creative element accounts for 49% of sales lift, significantly outweighing the impact of targeting (11%), reach (22%), and brand factors (15%).6 This finding underscores that while media placement and targeting are important, the power of the message itself is paramount in driving purchase behaviour.

Historically, creatively awarded campaigns have also shown superior performance in generating market share growth. Studies fusing creative award data (like the Gunn Report) with effectiveness data (like the IPA Databank) revealed that creatively recognised campaigns achieved significantly higher market share gains than non-awarded campaigns, often despite operating with lower relative media budgets, measured by Extra Share of Voice (ESOV).12

Beyond immediate sales and market share, creativity exerts a strong influence on brand perceptions and consumer attitudes. A meta-analysis encompassing 93 datasets confirmed robust positive effects of creativity across various consumer response metrics.4 Notably, the impact on attitudinal measures (such as attitude towards the ad and attitude towards the brand) was found to be significantly stronger than the impact on memory-based outcomes (like ad recall or brand recall).4 This suggests that creativity's primary power lies in its ability to foster positive feelings and associations with the ad and, by extension, the brand, rather than simply making the advertisement memorable in isolation. Other studies corroborate this, showing creative advertising enhances visual attention, improves affect towards the ad and brand, and boosts ad recognition.15 Furthermore, highly creative ads have been linked to substantially higher profitability compared to low-creativity counterparts.18

However, we must acknowledge recent research, particularly from Peter Field using IPA data, which indicates the effectiveness advantage historically enjoyed by creatively awarded campaigns has been declining over the past decade.19 Field attributes this primarily to a growing industry focus on short-term activation goals at the expense of long-term brand building, leading to a misuse of creativity.19 This decline does not necessarily invalidate the fundamental power of effective creativity itself, but it does signal a potential misalignment between the types of campaigns currently winning creative awards and the strategies that drive sustained business value. If award criteria increasingly favour short-termism, while long-term brand building (where creativity historically excelled) remains the key driver of profitability, the industry may be inadvertently rewarding less effective approaches. This is particularly relevant for charity fundraisers who are largely concerned with direct response tactics and necessitates a critical evaluation of how creative success is defined, measured, and incentivised.

1.3 Emotion as the Engine

A pivotal contribution to understanding advertising effectiveness comes from the extensive research by Les Binet and Peter Field, analysing the IPA Effectiveness Databank. Their work highlights the profound impact of emotion in driving long-term brand growth and profitability.22 A core finding is that advertising campaigns relying primarily on emotional appeal consistently outperform those based on rational persuasion, particularly over the long term.22 While rational messaging can be effective for immediate, direct-response objectives, emotional strategies prove superior for building enduring brand strength.22

The mechanism behind this lies in how emotional advertising works. It builds brands more strongly across multiple dimensions – including awareness, commitment, trust, differentiation, fame, and image – by forging deep-seated emotional bonds and associations in consumers' minds.23 These feelings towards a brand tend to be more durable and longer-lasting than memories of factual information or product features.23 Consequently, the positive effects of emotional campaigns accumulate and strengthen over time, leading to greater long-term sales, market share growth, enhanced pricing power, and increased customer loyalty.20 This cumulative impact translates directly into significantly higher profitability for emotionally driven campaigns.23

Creativity plays a crucial role in generating these vital emotional connections. Effective creative executions are adept at telling stories, evoking feelings, and creating the memorable emotional structures necessary for long-term brand building.20 Advertising that entertains, uses humour appropriately, and is generally likable tends to be more memorable and effective at building brand affinity.24 Therefore, prioritising emotional connection over purely rational messaging appears essential for unlocking the full long-term potential of creative advertising. Since creativity excels at generating feeling 20, focusing creative development on evoking resonant emotions, rather than simply conveying product benefits or information, aligns directly with the strategies proven to maximise sustained business impact.22 

This contrasts sharply with the often short-term, rational metrics prevalent in much of the digital advertising landscape. An over-reliance on easily measured, immediate results like clicks or conversions might inadvertently steer marketers away from the emotional, creative brand-building investments required for long-term health and profitability, potentially contributing to the "crisis in creative effectiveness" identified by Field.19

‍

2. The Hidden Tax on Dullness: Why Boring Ads Cost More

While the benefits of creativity are well-documented, the converse – the cost of boring advertising – is equally significant, representing a substantial hidden tax on marketing budgets. Boring ads are not merely ineffective; they are actively inefficient, requiring greater investment to achieve even baseline results.

2.1 Measuring the Absence of Emotional Engagement

Boring advertising can be characterised by its failure to elicit a significant emotional response from the audience. Research using consumer emotional response testing, such as facial coding analysis employed by firms like System1, quantifies this lack of engagement.26 These methods measure the presence and intensity of emotional reactions (positive, negative, or neutral) to advertising stimuli. Ads that predominantly evoke neutrality – a state of "feeling nothing" – are classified as dull.26 High neutrality corresponds to objectively identifying ads as boring in terms of their likely market impact.26

The prevalence of such emotionally inert advertising is alarmingly high. Studies analysing large datasets of commercials have found that neutrality is the most common response to TV advertising in major markets like the US and UK.26 One analysis of 57,000 US TV ads found that 47% were considered "very dull," having essentially no emotional impact on viewers.31 The situation appears even more pronounced in the business-to-business (B2B) sector, where some estimates suggest around 78% of ads fail to connect emotionally.29

This ability to measure the absence of emotional response transforms the concept of "boring" from a purely subjective critique into a quantifiable indicator of likely ineffectiveness. It allows for an objective assessment of an ad's potential based on its ability to engage the audience emotionally – a prerequisite for building memories and brand associations.11 The widespread existence of dull advertising points towards potential systemic weaknesses within the advertising ecosystem. Factors such as excessive risk aversion, an overemphasis on rational messaging, the use of testing methodologies that fail to capture emotional nuance, or intense time pressures that prevent creative refinement may contribute to this phenomenon.26 Addressing the high frequency of boring ads likely requires changes in creative development, testing protocols, and client-agency approval processes to better foster and recognise emotionally engaging work.

2.2 Creative Ads Achieve More with Less

The historical performance difference between creative and non-creative advertising campaigns starkly illustrates the concept of creative efficiency. Analysis of the IPA Databank consistently showed that creatively awarded campaigns delivered substantially greater market share growth per point of Extra Share of Voice (ESOV is a measure of media weight relative to market share) compared to their non-awarded counterparts.12

During its peak period of observed advantage (roughly the mid-to-late 2000s), creatively awarded campaigns were estimated to be extraordinarily efficient, achieving results 11 to 12 times more efficiently than non-awarded campaigns based on ESOV.12 Even in earlier periods or when looking at the overall dataset across longer timeframes, the efficiency multiplier remained significant, often cited as around 7 times overall.12 This demonstrates that highly creative campaigns were able to generate disproportionately large business effects relative to their media investment.12 They effectively acted as a media multiplier, achieving more impact with less relative spend, partly attributed to their ability to generate "fame" or buzz that amplified the core media investment.13

However, as previously noted, Peter Field's subsequent research documented a dramatic decline in this efficiency advantage for awarded campaigns in the years leading up to 2018.19 The multiplier fell significantly, perhaps to four times or less, a trend Field linked directly to the industry's shift towards short-termism and a consequent misuse of creative potential.19

Despite this recent decline for awarded campaigns (which may reflect issues with award criteria as much as with creativity itself), the underlying principle remains: effective creativity enhances media efficiency. 

The historical data provides compelling evidence that the quality and resonance of the creative message can dramatically reduce the amount of media weight required to achieve specific business objectives like market share growth. This inherent efficiency advantage is a key component of the financial argument for investing in strong creative work. The erosion of this multiplier, linked to strategic shifts away from long-term brand building, underscores the financial risks associated with prioritising short-term, tactical execution over sustained, creative brand development. It suggests that current trends favouring activation might be inadvertently making advertising less efficient overall, strengthening the case for returning to proven principles to maximise return on investment.

‍

2.3 Calculating the "Cost of Dull"

The cost multipliers associated with dull advertising translate into potentially enormous sums of wasted media investment. Requiring double or even 2.6 times the media spend to achieve the same impact means that budgets allocated to boring campaigns are working significantly harder, yet less effectively.11 This inefficiency represents a direct financial drain. Estimates based on these multipliers suggest that billions of dollars in advertising spend could be considered wasted or sub-optimally deployed due to ineffective creative.6

For instance, one analysis extrapolating from the data suggested that dull US television advertising might necessitate an additional $228 billion in media spending to generate the market share growth delivered by the most emotionally impactful campaigns.31 A similar estimate for the UK market suggested that an average dull campaign might need an extra £10 million ($19.32 million USD approx.) per year in budget just to match the business effects achieved by the most emotive campaigns.29

The underlying mechanism is straightforward, boring ads fail to capture attention, create lasting memories, or build strong brand associations.11 Consequently, the media budget used to deliver these ads achieves little cut-through; impressions are paid for, but they fail to make a meaningful impression on the consumer.6 This inefficiency can be compounded by issues within the media supply chain itself, such as investment in low-quality programmatic inventory like Made-for-Advertising (MFA) websites, which represented 21% of impressions in one ANA study, further diluting the impact of ad spend.32

Furthermore, the trend towards performance marketing (direct response marketing), with its focus on short-term, transactional metrics, may inadvertently contribute to the creation of duller advertising.26 While performance channels are essential, an over-reliance on them without a foundation of strong, emotionally resonant brand building can render the performance spend itself less efficient over time.29 This highlights a critical flaw in treating creative development merely as a cost center, separate from media investment. The evidence strongly suggests that investing strategically in developing effective, non-dull creative can yield significant savings in required media expenditure for equivalent results. Therefore, creative investment should be viewed as a powerful lever for improving overall media efficiency and return on investment, not simply as an isolated expense line.

‍

3. Key Levers for Effectiveness and Efficiency

Understanding the link between creativity and efficiency is only the first step. Optimising advertising impact requires leveraging specific strategies related to consistency, strategic focus, media choices, and contextual adaptation.

3.1 The Long-Term Value of Sticking to a Strong Creative Platform

The cumulative impact of creative advertising is significantly influenced by consistency. A landmark study by System1 and the IPA, titled 'Compound Creativity', analysed over 4,000 ads from 56 brands across five years, introducing a metric called the Creative Consistency Score (CCS).28 This research revealed that consistency is not the enemy of creativity but rather a powerful amplifier of its effects.

The study's key findings demonstrate that brands exhibiting high creative consistency achieve superior results over time. Consistent brands were found to produce higher-quality creative work, as measured by System1's Star Rating (predicting long-term brand-building potential), and crucially, their creative quality tended to improve year-on-year.28 In contrast, inconsistent brands showed no average improvement in creative quality annually. This divergence creates a "consistency gap" that compounds the benefits of creativity over time.28 After five years, advertising from the most consistent brands was projected to grow market share more than twice as effectively as that from the least consistent brands, assuming equivalent media spend.35

This consistency translates into tangible business outcomes. Campaigns from the most consistent brands generated 27% more "Very Large Brand Effects" (such as gains in awareness, differentiation, salience) and 28% more "Very Large Business Effects" (including sales value gain, profit gain, market share gain) as reported in the rigorous IPA Effectiveness Databank.28 Notably, the most consistent brands reported double the instances of very large profit gains compared to less consistent ones.28

The research identified several facets of consistency, grouped into three areas: Consistent Creative Foundations (brand positioning, core creative idea, agency relationship tenure), Culture of Consistency (use of creative wear-in, cross-channel consistency, commitment to "showmanship," reusing assets), and Consistent Execution (brand assets like logos/colors, tone of voice, slogan, characters, celebrities, soundtracks).34 Factors like maintaining longer relationships with creative agencies and allowing successful creative campaigns to "wear in" (remain on air longer) were directly linked to higher creative quality and effectiveness.30 Conversely, creative inconsistency carries a significant cost; one estimate suggested that brands lagging in consistency might need to spend an additional £3.47 billion collectively over five years to achieve the same growth as the most consistent brands.35

This body of work clearly indicates that the effectiveness of advertising creative is not solely determined by the brilliance of individual executions but is substantially enhanced by the strategic application of a consistent creative approach over extended periods. The benefits of creativity appear to accumulate and compound when brands commit to a coherent platform and execution style. This implies that common industry practices like frequent agency reviews or rapid campaign turnover, often driven by short-term pressures or a perceived need for constant novelty, may be actively detrimental to building brand value and maximizing marketing efficiency. Such churn prevents the compounding effect observed in consistent brands and likely contributes to the "cost of dullness" by necessitating frequent resets and hindering the development and leveraging of strong, enduring creative assets and memory structures.

3.2 Resisting Short-Termism to Unlock Creativity's Full Potential

The strategic balance between long-term brand building and short-term sales activation is a critical determinant of overall marketing effectiveness, and it significantly impacts how creativity contributes to results. Foundational work by Binet and Field established the general principle that optimal effectiveness is typically achieved by allocating approximately 60% of the marketing budget to long-term brand-building activities and 40% to short-term sales activation.9 This 60/40 guideline has proven remarkably robust, remaining relevant even amidst the evolution of the digital media landscape.9

However, Peter Field's subsequent research, documented in reports like "The Crisis in Creative Effectiveness," identified a concerning trend: a marked shift in the industry, particularly noticeable among creatively awarded campaigns, towards prioritising short-term activation goals.19 This short-termism, characterised by campaigns running for less than six months and focusing heavily on immediate sales metrics, has been pinpointed as a primary driver behind the observed decline in the effectiveness and efficiency advantage of awarded creativity.19

The reason short-termism undermines creative effectiveness is fundamental to how brand building works. Creativity realises very little of its full potential when confined to short time horizons.19 Its strength lies in building emotional connections and durable memory structures that prime consumers towards a brand over the long run – processes that inherently take time and repetition.20 Focusing primarily on immediate activation leads to the creation of "disposable" creative ideas that lack the staying power to build lasting brand equity and are ultimately less efficient.19

Analysis comparing high-performing and low-performing creatively awarded campaigns reveals distinct strategic differences. High performers tend to maintain a more balanced approach to short- and long-term objectives, keep campaigns in market for longer durations (typically at least six months to embed behavioural change), employ broader consumer targeting strategies, and allocate a greater proportion of their budget specifically to brand building.19 Low performers, conversely, disproportionately focus on short-term sales activation objectives, often at the expense of long-term goals like market share growth.19

This evidence strongly suggests that the strategic context – the timeframe and objectives assigned to a campaign – heavily dictates the potential impact of the creative execution itself. Applying creative techniques primarily to short-term activation goals significantly diminishes their effectiveness compared to deploying them in service of long-term brand building.19 The prevailing pressure within many organizations for immediate, easily measurable results, often amplified by the abundance of short-term metrics available in digital channels 27, creates a systemic bias against the kind of sustained, creative brand investment that has been proven to drive long-term profitability. This focus on the short term leads to underinvestment in brand building 9 and a misapplication of creative resources, ultimately hindering sustainable growth and efficiency.

3.3 How Platform Choice and Attention Amplify (or Mute) Creative Impact

The interplay between creative execution and media strategy is crucial. The choice of media channels and the attention they command can significantly amplify or diminish the impact of even the strongest creative ideas. The importance of media in driving sales outcomes has grown substantially over the past decade, increasing from contributing 15% to 36% of sales lift in one longitudinal analysis, facilitated by advancements in data and technology that enable more sophisticated targeting, reach optimisation, and timing (recency).10

Attention has emerged as a particularly critical factor linking media and creative effectiveness.36 Research combining effectiveness data with attention metrics demonstrates that higher-attention media platforms significantly enhance the performance of strong creative campaigns.36 Placing powerful creative on high-attention platforms can supercharge the attention levels achieved by up to 75% compared to placing it on low-attention platforms.38 This synergy translates into business results, with the impact of marketing investment increasing by as much as 65% when strong creative is paired with high-attention media.36 Furthermore, strong creative itself has the power to hold audience attention for significantly longer durations, sometimes up to three times longer, even among already effective campaigns.38

However, attention levels vary considerably across different media platforms and formats.36 Attention tends to decay more rapidly on some platforms than others, impacting the ability to lodge brand messages in memory.36 Many digital advertising formats, in particular, garner very low levels of attention; one study suggested that 85% of digital ads receive less than the 2.5 seconds of active attention considered necessary to build or refresh memory structures.18 While high-attention platforms amplify creative, even strong creative struggles to overcome the inherent limitations of low-attention environments.36 This implies that simply achieving reach on low-attention platforms may be insufficient for effective brand building.

The optimal scenario involves the convergence of powerful creative, placement on high-attention media platforms, and adequate budget levels (positive ESOV).36 It is the combination of these factors that maximises return on investment. While some, like Professor Byron Sharp, caution against an excessive focus on maximizing attention duration beyond a necessary threshold 37, the weight of evidence suggests that attention quality is a key mediator of creative effectiveness.36

This highlights the deep interdependence of creative and media strategies. Media planning should not be viewed solely as an exercise in maximizing reach at the lowest cost, but as a strategic choice of environments that provide the best opportunity for the creative message to capture attention and resonate with the audience.36 The proliferation of low-attention digital inventory may inadvertently contribute to the challenges in creative effectiveness observed in recent years. If significant portions of advertising budgets are shifted to environments where ads receive minimal attention 18, and creative impact is muted on such platforms 36, then even well-executed creative may struggle to deliver results. This necessitates a more critical approach to media planning, prioritizing attention quality alongside reach and cost, particularly for brand-building objectives.

3.4 When Creative Strategies Need Adaptation

While the general principles of creative effectiveness are robust, their application requires nuance and adaptation based on specific market contexts, brand characteristics, and consumer factors. A one-size-fits-all approach to creativity is unlikely to be optimal.

Brand familiarity significantly moderates creativity's impact. Research using eye-tracking experiments found that highly creative advertising can sometimes be less effective for well-known, familiar brands, potentially leading to lower brand affect and recognition compared to less creative approaches.15 Conversely, for unfamiliar brands, high creativity proved more beneficial, enhancing brand affect and recognition.15 This suggests creativity is particularly valuable for helping newer or less established brands cut through advertising clutter and gain traction.17

The level of consumer involvement with the product category also plays a role. The positive effects of advertising creativity on both ad and brand responses tend to be stronger for high-involvement products (those requiring more consumer thought and consideration) compared to low-involvement ones.4

Furthermore, the balance between creativity's core dimensions – originality and appropriateness – matters. While originality is key for driving affect transfer (positive feelings spilling over), appropriateness is more critical for signaling brand quality and effort, particularly in high-involvement or low-familiarity situations.4 Relying solely on originality, without ensuring relevance and fit, generally leads to weaker effects on consumer attitudes.4

The competitive landscape also introduces complexity. Highly creative ads have been shown to potentially impair consumer recall for other, less creative advertisements shown in the same context, with this impairment effect being stronger for direct competitors.16 This suggests a potential offensive benefit of creativity in hindering competitors' message recall.

Targeting strategies also require careful consideration. While digital platforms offer precise targeting capabilities, an overly narrow focus can undermine the broad reach often necessary for long-term brand building.19 Effective targeting should be evidence-based, avoid concentrating solely on existing heavy buyers (who may offer limited growth potential), and ensure the creative itself possesses broad appeal.24 Worryingly, studies indicate that many campaigns, particularly in FMCG, fail to effectively reach relevant category or brand buyers, forcing the creative to work harder.10

These findings collectively demonstrate that the optimal creative strategy is highly context-dependent. Factors like the brand's existing market position, the nature of the product category, the specific communication goals, and the competitive environment all influence how different creative approaches will perform. Simply striving for maximum originality may not always be the best path; a nuanced strategy is required. This necessitates sophisticated diagnostic thinking by marketers, moving beyond generic best practices to tailor the type, intensity, and specific execution of creativity to the unique circumstances of their brand and market, ensuring alignment between creative ambition and strategic context.

‍

4. Creativity in Practice: Success Stories Across Sectors

The principles of creative effectiveness and efficiency are borne out in numerous real-world examples, spanning both commercial enterprises and the non-profit sector. Examining successful campaigns provides tangible illustrations of how creative thinking, often combined with strategic media planning, can drive significant results, sometimes even overcoming budget limitations.

4.1 Commercial Case Studies: Demonstrating Efficiency Through Creative Excellence

Campaigns recognised by prestigious effectiveness awards programs like the IPA Effectiveness Awards and the Effie Awards serve as valuable case studies, as these programs rigorously evaluate proven business results. Many winners demonstrate how strong creative ideas lead to enhanced efficiency and impressive returns on investment.

A notable example is Xero, the accounting software provider, which won an IPA Effectiveness Bronze award.39 Targeting small businesses, Xero employed memorably humorous and empathetic advertising. Despite being a smaller player competing against larger rivals, their creative approach helped close the gap. The campaign delivered an estimated long-term gross profit Return on Investment (ROI) of £4.07 for every £1 invested in marketing. Xero attributed this success directly to the combination of entertaining creative, an emotive brand positioning, and agile media planning, concluding that their investment in brand building proved to be an efficient catalyst for business growth.39

Similarly, HSBC UK secured an IPA Bronze for demonstrating "The value of a point of view".40 After retiring a long-standing global positioning, the bank faced declining brand rankings and reduced communication efficiency. They implemented a bold new strategy, tackling timely societal issues like globalism, homelessness, and domestic abuse through campaigns led by TV and Outdoor media, featuring prominent use of their distinctive red hexagon logo. Despite having lower advertising spend than key competitors, HSBC successfully increased its brand power and consideration metrics. Econometric modeling estimated that their communications generated an impressive £380 million in incremental profit between 2019 and 2023, with brand marketing identified as the primary driver of new sales. The campaign's distinctiveness and relevance earned significant media attention, amplifying the impact of their investment.40

Another compelling case is Pot Noodle's "Lost the Pot" campaign, which earned double Gold and Silver Effies in Europe.41 Tasked with relaunching a product format that had previously failed disastrously due to poor taste, and armed with only a minimal budget, the brand adopted a strategy of radical honesty. Using blunt British humor and self-deprecation, the campaign openly acknowledged the previous failure with lines like "No longer crap... Now with flavour." This bold, truthful approach resonated strongly on social media, rebuilding consumer trust and reigniting interest. The results were dramatic: a 38% increase in market share within a key retailer (Asda), a 21% rise in household penetration, and an incremental revenue ROI of 2.6:1, achieved far faster than targeted. This campaign powerfully illustrates how creativity, specifically through honesty and humor, can overcome significant challenges like negative brand history and severe budget constraints.41

These examples align with the broader principle that strong creative often allows campaigns to achieve more with less media spending.12 They highlight how leveraging emotion – whether humor, empathy, or alignment with values – and developing distinctive, memorable executions can create standout and drive efficiency, even in competitive markets or with limited resources. Furthermore, the Xero and HSBC cases explicitly demonstrate the importance of measuring and communicating the financial return generated by creative, brand-building efforts. Proving this impact was crucial for securing ongoing investment and elevating the strategic importance of marketing within their respective organisations.39

4.2 Driving Mission Impact with Creativity on a Budget

The nor-for-profit sector presents a unique context for advertising creativity, characterised by significant resource constraints but driven by powerful missions.42 Charities often face tight budgets, limited staffing for marketing efforts, and the challenge of motivating donations and support without appearing overly commercial or diverting funds from core programs.42

Research indicates that charity advertising campaigns are generally effective, particularly at driving short-term responses like donations and sign-ups, often achieving lower costs per acquisition than average.45 However, overall effectiveness in the sector has shown some decline in recent years.45 A key characteristic is a heavy reliance on short-term campaigns (often responding to immediate needs or events) and a relative underinvestment in long-term brand building; only around 8% of charity campaigns run for longer than a year.45 While multi-channel campaigns (using three or more channels) are proven to be more effective overall, many charity campaigns use fewer channels.46

Given these constraints, creativity in the non-profit sector often manifests through resourceful communication strategies and compelling storytelling, rather than high-cost production. Several low-budget tactics prove particularly effective:

  • Emotional Storytelling: Sharing authentic, personal stories of impact is paramount for connecting with potential donors and volunteers on an emotional level.42 Consistently showcasing the real-world difference the organisation makes builds trust and engagement.42
  • Search Engine Optimisation (SEO): Considered a highly cost-effective, long-term strategy with strong ROI for non-profits.44 Optimising website content with relevant keywords helps charities reach individuals actively searching for causes or donation opportunities, increasing visibility and targeted engagement.44
  • Social Media Marketing: Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn allow charities to build communities, share impactful stories visually, and use relevant hashtags to expand reach, often at low cost.43 Boosting posts provides an affordable way to increase visibility beyond organic reach.43 Integrating across platforms, potentially including TikTok, can amplify messages.47
  • Email Marketing: Non-profits typically enjoy high email open rates (25-46%).43 Email is effective for nurturing relationships, sharing updates and success stories, and making clear calls to action (donate, volunteer, learn more). Segmentation and automation tools can help personalise communication efficiently.43
  • Google Ad Grants: Eligible non-profits can access up to $10,000 per month in free Google Search advertising credits, providing significant reach potential if managed effectively.43
  • Partnerships: Collaborating with like-minded businesses, influencers, or other non-profits can significantly amplify reach and lend credibility to campaigns without substantial financial outlay.44

Successful examples demonstrate these tactics in action. The viral ALS Ice Bucket Challenge used simplicity, a clear call to action, and social sharing to raise over $115 million.47 Donate Life Kentucky's "Save My Human" campaign employed a creative, humorous concept (pets advocating for organ donation) across multiple channels, including a microsite, social media, and pet influencers, successfully boosting registrations.47 A case study of the Helping One Guy organisation showed how consistent, story-driven Facebook posts significantly grew followers (17.7%) and reach (37.6%) despite a tight budget.42

These examples underscore that for not-for-profits, creative effectiveness often hinges on ingenuity in communication and the power of authentic narratives rather than large production budgets. While the sector excels at generating immediate responses, there may be an untapped opportunity to enhance long-term impact and donor loyalty by strategically incorporating more brand-building principles alongside activation campaigns. Balancing the immediate need for fundraising with efforts to build sustained awareness and emotional connection could potentially strengthen overall effectiveness, although the inherent pressures of the sector make this a challenging equilibrium to achieve.45

‍

5. Making the Strategic Case for Investing in Creativity

The accumulated evidence presents a compelling case for the strategic importance of creativity in advertising. Far from being a mere aesthetic overlay, creativity, when defined appropriately and deployed effectively, is a fundamental driver of both advertising effectiveness and media efficiency. Conversely, neglecting creative quality in favour of "boring," emotionally neutral advertising imposes a significant, quantifiable cost on marketing efforts.

5.1 The Overwhelming Evidence for Creative Effectiveness and Efficiency

The research synthesised in this report consistently points to several key conclusions. Firstly, advertising creativity, characterised by both originality and appropriateness, demonstrably enhances campaign performance across crucial business metrics, including sales lift, market share growth, and positive shifts in brand attitudes.4 Secondly, creative approaches that successfully evoke emotion are particularly powerful, proving more effective than purely rational messages in building strong brands and driving long-term profitability.22

Thirdly, the absence of creativity – resulting in "boring" or emotionally flat advertising – is not just ineffective but actively inefficient. Such campaigns require substantially higher media investment (estimated at 2 to 2.6 times more) to achieve the same business impact as their more engaging counterparts, representing a significant hidden cost or "tax on dullness".11 Finally, the impact of creativity is not absolute but is significantly amplified by strategic factors such as long-term consistency in creative platforms, a balanced investment approach prioritizing brand building alongside activation, and the selection of high-attention media channels that allow the creative message to cut through.19

5.2 Recommendations

Based on the evidence, organisations seeking to maximise their return on advertising investment should consider the following recommendations:

  1. Define and Measure Creativity Strategically: Move beyond subjective assessments. Establish clear definitions of creativity that align with business objectives, incorporating both originality and appropriateness.8 Employ measurement tools and methodologies that capture emotional response and predict long-term brand-building potential, complementing short-term performance metrics.6 Integrate both quantitative data and qualitative insights for a holistic view.7
  2. Prioritise Emotion and Distinctiveness: Actively invest in creative development that aims to build strong emotional connections with the audience.23 Consistently leverage distinctive brand assets (visuals, characters, sounds, tone) to enhance recognition and memorability.24 Use humour and entertainment strategically where appropriate to increase engagement and likeability.24
  3. Cultivate Long-Term Consistency: Develop enduring creative platforms rather than relying on a constant stream of disparate campaigns. Resist the temptation for unnecessary changes in direction or frequent agency switches. Allow successful creative executions sufficient time in market ("wear-in") to maximise their cumulative impact.28
  4. Balance Brand Building and Activation: Adhere to evidence-based budget allocation principles, such as Binet and Field's 60/40 guideline, ensuring adequate investment is dedicated to long-term brand health alongside short-term sales generation.9 Avoid letting short-term pressures cannibalise brand-building efforts.
  5. Integrate Creative and Media Planning for Attention: Recognise the interdependence of creative and media. Select media channels not just based on reach or cost, but also on their ability to command audience attention and provide a suitable context for the creative message to resonate.36
  6. Implement Rigorous Testing and Learning: Use pre-testing tools that assess emotional response and predictive effectiveness to filter out potentially "dull" creative before significant media investment.6 Employ in-market measurement techniques (e.g., brand lift studies, attention tracking, marketing mix modelling) to understand what works and optimise ongoing campaigns.49

5.3 Why Prioritising Creativity is Crucial for Sustainable Brand Growth

The conclusion is unequivocal: boring advertising is an expensive mistake. It is less effective at achieving business goals and demands significantly higher media expenditure to deliver even modest results.6 Investing in the development of strong, emotionally resonant, and distinctive creative work is not a discretionary expense but a strategic imperative for enhancing media efficiency and driving profitability.12

In today's increasingly fragmented and saturated media environment, capturing consumer attention is harder than ever.11 Creativity provides the vital spark needed to cut through the noise, make a lasting impression, and build the mental availability – the propensity for a brand to come to mind in a buying situation – that fuels future demand and long-term growth.6 Resisting the pervasive pull of short-term metrics and making a sustained, strategic commitment to creative excellence is essential for building resilient brands and securing a lasting competitive advantage.19 Ultimately, the ability of organisations to systematically foster, measure, and deploy effective creativity not merely as an artistic function but as a core business discipline and strategic growth lever may well determine their future competitiveness in the marketplace.2

Works cited

  1. The Definition and Measurement of Creativity: What Do We Know? - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1017/s0021849904040097
  2. Marketing Creativity Defined! - Marketing Accountability Standards Board | MASB, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://themasb.org/marketing-creativity-defined/
  3. The Definition and Measurement of Creativity: What Do We Know? | Journal of Advertising Research - Cambridge University Press, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-advertising-research/article/definition-and-measurement-of-creativity-what-do-we-know/27ED5A15E5F365133FA4C42AE1D63419
  4. research.hhs.se, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://research.hhs.se/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=46SSOE_INST&filePid=1357922400006056&download=true
  5. Does anyone know if and how creativity can be "measured" in online advertising?, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does-anyone-know-if-and-how-creativity-can-be-measured-in-online-advertising
  6. The secret behind advertising effectiveness: It's the creative - Eskimi, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.eskimi.com/blog/creative-advertising-effectiveness
  7. Beyond the Canvas: Key Metrics for Creative Performance - Paymo, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.paymoapp.com/blog/key-metrics-for-creative-performance/
  8. Measuring Creativity Initiative - Marketing Accountability Standards Board | MASB, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://themasb.org/projects/special-initiatives/measuring-creativity/
  9. There is a crisis of creativity in advertising - Ebiquity, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://ebiquity.com/news-insights/blog/there-is-a-crisis-of-creativity-in-advertising/
  10. When it Comes to Advertising Effectiveness, What is Key? - Nielsen, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.nielsen.com/insights/2017/when-it-comes-to-advertising-effectiveness-what-is-key/
  11. The truth about advertising effectiveness: It's the creative - Eskimi, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.eskimi.com/blog/the-truth-about-advertising-effectiveness-its-the-creative
  12. srh.agency, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://srh.agency/assets/documents/dispatch-1466161111_Creativity_and_Effectiveness.pdf
  13. The greater the creative, the greater the effect - Campaign Brief, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://campaignbrief.com/the-greater-the-creative-the-g/
  14. The Value of creativity | The Marketing Society, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.marketingsociety.com/the-library/value-creativity
  15. Who Needs Highly Creative Advertising?: How Brand Familiarity Moderates Creativity's Influence on Attention, Affect, and Memory - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2501/JAR-2023-017
  16. New study explores the effects of creative advertising on brand recall - Kansas State University, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.k-state.edu/today/announcement/?id=48523
  17. Can advertising creativity overcome clutter?: affect, attention, and memory, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://figshare.mq.edu.au/articles/thesis/Can_advertising_creativity_overcome_clutter_affect_attention_and_memory/19441064/1
  18. Highly creative ads are four times more profitable than low creative quality ads - BBN, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://bbn-international.com/2024/10/17/creative-advertising-b2b-marketing-warcs-insights/
  19. ipa.co.uk, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://ipa.co.uk/media/9270/ipa0175_the-crisis-in-creative-effectiveness-brochure_aw_180619.pdf
  20. The crisis in creative effectiveness - IPA, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://ipa.co.uk/media/7699/ipa_crisis_in_creative_effectiveness_2019.pdf
  21. The Crisis in Creative Effectiveness - IPA, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://ipa.co.uk/knowledge/publications-reports/the-crisis-in-creative-effectiveness
  22. This Much I Learned: Les Binet and Peter Field on 10 years of The Long and the Short of It, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.marketingweek.com/this-much-i-learned-les-binet-peter-field/
  23. Rational Versus Emotional Creative: Short-Term And Long-Term Impact | Westwood One, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.westwoodone.com/blog/2018/06/25/rational-versus-emotional-creative-short-term-and-long-term-impact/
  24. Can Advertising Creativity Drive Business Growth? And What's Science Got To Do With It, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://marketingscience.info/can-advertising-creativity-drive-business-growth/
  25. Unlocking marketing effectiveness through creativity - Hallam, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://hallam.agency/blog/unlocking-marketing-effectiveness-through-creativity/
  26. The Extraordinary Cost of Dull: Boring Ads Require 2X To 2.6X Greater Media Spend To Achieve Same Impact As Interesting Ads | Westwood One, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.westwoodone.com/blog/2025/01/27/the-extraordinary-cost-of-dull-boring-ads-require-2x-to-2-6x-greater-media-spend-to-achieve-same-impact-as-interesting-ads/
  27. RESEARCH PRIORITIES 2022-2024 - Marketing Science Institute, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.msi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/MSI-2022-24-Research-Priorities-Final.pdf
  28. Compound Creativity - System1 Group, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://system1group.com/compound-creativity-system1-ipa
  29. The cost of a dull and boring brand - Guts Creative, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://gutscreative.com.au/blog/the-cost-of-a-boring-brand/
  30. Brand Consistency With IPA & System1, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://system1group.com/brand-consistency-compound-creativity
  31. What's the cost of boring? - SRH, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://srh.agency/whats-the-cost-of-boring/
  32. ANA Provides “First Look” at In-depth Programmatic Media Transparency Study, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.ana.net/content/show/id/pr-2023-06-programmaticstudy
  33. The 1% Leaves Room for Brands to Harness the “Multiplier Effect” | System1 Group, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://system1group.com/blog/the-multiplier-effect
  34. How creative consistency strengthens brands and business effects - IPA, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://ipa.co.uk/news/creative-consistency
  35. System1 and IPA Reveal How Creative Consistency Compounds Advertising, Brand and Business Effects | LBBOnline, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://lbbonline.com/news/system1-and-ipa-reveal-how-creative-consistency-compounds-advertising-brand-and-business-effects
  36. Attention, creativity & spend: ad effectiveness study reveals the three factors driving maximum ROI - Advertising Council Australia, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://advertisingcouncil.org.au/news/attention-creativity-spend-ad-effectiveness-study-reveals-the-three-factors-driving-maximum-roi/
  37. Do big and small brands need different kinds of attention? - Contagious, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.contagious.com/news-and-views/why-big-and-small-brands-need-to-think-about-attention-differently
  38. High-attention media supercharges impact of strong creative: Attention and Effectiveness: To ESOV and Beyond Part II - Effie Australia, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://advertisingcouncil.org.au/effies/news/high-attention-media-supercharges-impact-of-strong-creative-attention-and-effectiveness-to-esov-and-beyond-part-ii/
  39. IPA Effectiveness Awards Case Study 2024 - December19, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.december19.co.uk/newsroom/ipa-effectiveness-awards-case-study-2024
  40. The value of a point of view - IPA Effectiveness Awards, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://ipaeffectivenessawards2024.awardsengine.com/winners/view_awards_entry.cfm?id_entry=100195
  41. Lost the Pot – Effie Awards Europe, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.effie-europe.com/2025/04/08/the-mermaid-copy/
  42. Non-Profit Content Marketing Case Study - The Breezy Company, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://thebreezycompany.co/case-study/non-profit-organizations-a-case-study/
  43. Optimizing Nonprofit Marketing on a Limited Budget - Trillion Creative, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://trillioncreative.com/optimizing-nonprofit-marketing-with-limited-budgets/
  44. How nonprofits can invest in marketing — even with a lower budget | NTEN, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.nten.org/blog/how-nonprofits-can-invest-in-marketing-even-with-a-lower-budget
  45. Maximising charity marketing campaigns' effectiveness, accessed on May 5, 2025, http://www.charitiesmanagement.com/Magazine-No147/M0U5E/page-5.php
  46. Volunteering for success: Charities and marketing | Opinion - Research Live, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.research-live.com/article/opinion/volunteering-for-success-charities-and-marketing/id/5100582
  47. 16 Best Nonprofit Marketing Campaigns 2025: Examples & Case Studies, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://fiftyandfifty.org/best-nonprofit-marketing-campaigns/
  48. The Key to a Successful Paid Media Campaign for Charities - Reflect Digital, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://www.reflectdigital.co.uk/blog/the-key-to-a-successful-paid-media-campaign-for-charities
  49. How creative commitment yields higher ROI - IPA, accessed on May 5, 2025, https://ipa.co.uk/knowledge/ipa-blog/how-creative-commitment-yields-higher-roi

‍

‍